FERC orders all 6 power grid operators to explain their data center hookup rules, with responses due by August 17, 2026

On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ordered PJM, MISO, SPP, CAISO, ISO New England and NYISO, the 6 organizations that run the shared power grids across the nation, to prove the rules each one uses for connecting data centers and other huge power users are fair or fix them. Each has 60 days to respond, a deadline that lands on August 17, 2026.

61regional grid operators FERC ordered to justify or fix their rules for connecting data centers, in orders issued the same day, June 18, 2026
60 days2time each grid operator has to respond, a deadline that lands on August 17, 2026
43%4yearly growth rate in data center electricity demand on the Midwest grid run by MISO since 2020

FERC orders power grid operators to explain data center hookup rules

FERC orders power grid operators to explain data center hookup rules. On June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the federal agency that oversees the high voltage power lines across the nation, issued 6 separate orders demanding that every regional grid operator it regulates either prove its rules for connecting a data center or other huge power user are already fair, or propose fixing them. Each order is a show cause order, a formal demand under section 206 of the Federal Power Act, the federal law that lets the commission force a change to the existing rules of a grid operator rather than wait for the operator to volunteer one. The 6 grid operators ordered to respond are PJM, MISO, SPP, CAISO, ISO New England and NYISO, the organizations that plan and run the shared power lines across most of the country. Each has 60 days to respond, a deadline that this site calculated falls on August 17, 2026 by counting forward from the June 18 order date, with a further 90 days available if requested within the first 45 days.

Deadlines grid operators face after the June 18, 2026 order
Intervention deadline21Resource adequacy report32Abeyance request deadline46Show cause response due60Stakeholder comment deadline900255075100days after the order

This site calculated these day counts itself, checking the calendar dates source 4 gives against the June 18, 2026 order date. No 1 source states all 5 day counts together in this form.

Source 4.

Show the numbers
Intervention deadline21
Resource adequacy report32
Abeyance request deadline46
Show cause response due60
Stakeholder comment deadline90

5 problems each grid operator must justify or fix

FERC told every grid operator to address 5 specific problems in its response. How it studies and processes a request from a large load to connect. How it stops the cost of upgrading the grid for 1 large customer from landing on the electricity bill of everyone else, a practice called cost shifting. How it handles a large load that builds its own power plant on site rather than draw fully from the shared grid. Whether it offers a cheaper connection to a large load willing to power down during the busiest hours on the grid. And how it studies power plants sited near, but not directly at, the connection point of a large load. The order followed an October 2025 directive from Secretary of Energy Chris Wright and 8 months of public comment that drew more than 3,500 pages of filings. Some coverage this site could not verify claims the orders reach about 200 million people or two thirds of the electricity used nationwide, but the underlying order names no population or electricity load figure at all, so that number does not appear here.

One grid already strained, and no single bar for large

The order responds to real strain already showing on 1 of the 6 grids. On the Midwest grid run by MISO, electricity demand from data centers grew at a compound annual growth rate of 43% since 2020. FERC itself proposed a starting bar for what counts as large enough to trigger the new rules, a new facility over 50 megawatts, a megawatt being a unit that measures how much electric power a facility can draw at once, connecting above 69 kilovolts, the voltage rating of the power line it plugs into. The Southwest Power Pool, the grid operator across the central United States, already runs a stricter bar of its own, counting anything over 10 megawatts as large if it connects at 69 kilovolts or below.

What counts as a large load, FERC and the Southwest Power PoolFERC suggested defaultSouthwest Power Pool own bar
0102030405050FERC default,above 69kilovolts10Southwest Power Pool,69 kilovoltsor below50Southwest Power Pool,above 69kilovoltsmegawatts

The FERC order itself names no megawatt threshold as binding. This is the starting bar FERC itself suggested, compared with the alternative the Southwest Power Pool already has accepted for itself, which is stricter for loads connecting at lower voltage.

Source 5.

Show the numbers
FERC default, above 69 kilovolts50
Southwest Power Pool, 69 kilovolts or below10
Southwest Power Pool, above 69 kilovolts50

We have the technology. We should use it now to enable faster interconnection of large loads, lower costs to customers, and help prevent cost shifting.

David LaCerte, Commissioner at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, speaking on the show cause orders. Source 1.

Robert Montejo, an energy attorney at the law firm Duane Morris who has been reading the orders for clients, said the response each grid operator chooses will shape who gets connected fastest.

The ability to curtail or operate flexibly could become one of the most valuable tools for getting new projects connected faster.

Robert Montejo, an energy attorney at the law firm Duane Morris. Source 1.

Sources

  1. 6 takeaways from FERC's data center interconnection decision. Utility Dive. Published 2026-06-22. Accessed 2026-09-21.
  2. FERC Issues Section 206 Show Cause Orders Directing All Six RTOs/ISOs to Justify or Reform Large Load Integration Rules. McGuireWoods. Published 2026-06. Accessed 2026-09-21.
  3. FERC Advances New Oversight Framework for Large Loads and Co Located Generation. Holland & Knight. Published 2026-06. Accessed 2026-09-21.
  4. FERC Issues Show Cause Orders to Six RTOs/ISOs on Large Load Integration. Day Pitney. Published 2026-06. Accessed 2026-09-21.
  5. Understanding FERC's Large Load Orders. RMI. Published 2026. Accessed 2026-09-21.

Was this article helpful

Back to the home page