A tax ruling ended an 11 year fight over which country can tax 2 Orsted offshore wind farms in the UK, after Denmark claimed 1.03 billion dollars

An advisory commission decided the wind farms are primarily taxable where they generate power, the UK, and Orsted says the real effect is a minor adjustment already covered by money set aside, far below the 1.03 billion dollars Denmark once claimed.

September 10, 20261the day an advisory commission ruled that 2 UK offshore wind farms operated by Orsted are primarily taxable in the UK, ending an 11 year dispute with Denmark
1.03 billion dollars5what Danish tax authorities had claimed in taxes and interest on the 2 wind farms, an amount Orsted says the ruling settles with only a minor tax adjustment already covered by money set aside
1.2 gigawatts2the rated capacity of Hornsea 1, which powers over 1 million UK homes, while Walney Extension is rated at 659 megawatts and powers nearly 600,000 homes

The Orsted tax ruling that ends a UK offshore wind double taxation dispute

An Orsted tax ruling on 2 UK offshore wind farms has closed an 11 year fight with Denmark over double taxation, a company paying tax on the same income twice. On September 10, 2026, the Danish Tax Agency and the UK tax authority, HM Revenue and Customs, told Orsted that an advisory commission, a panel set up to decide exactly this kind of cross border dispute, had issued its final opinion on which country can tax profits from Hornsea 1 and Walney Extension, 2 offshore wind farms. The commission found the projects have a genuine legal and economic purpose and are primarily taxable where they physically sit and generate power, the UK, not Denmark.

Why the dispute took 11 years to resolve

Orsted first asked the 2 tax agencies to settle the question in 2015. When Denmark and the UK could not agree between themselves, the case moved in 2023 to an advisory commission set up under the EU Arbitration Convention, a European Union process built to settle cross border tax disputes like this one. The final ruling landed in 2026, 11 years after Orsted first asked and 8 years after the case reached formal arbitration, both counted here from the dates Orsted, Kalkine Media and Reuters each report.

Years from Orsted first tax question to final rulingMilestones on the way to the rulingThe final ruling
03691202015First asked82023Referred to arbitration112026Final rulingyears since 2015

Years elapsed are counted from 2015, calculated for this article from the dates Orsted, Kalkine Media and Reuters all report, not a duration any source states directly.

Source 1.

Show the numbers
2015 First asked0
2023 Referred to arbitration8
2026 Final ruling11

The finding behind the ruling

Danish tax authorities had claimed 6.6 billion Danish kroner, about 1.03 billion dollars, in taxes and interest on the 2 wind farms, according to Reuters. In the press release announcing the ruling, Orsted describes the actual financial effect very differently, calling it a minor upward adjustment to its Danish tax position, already fully covered by money set aside for exactly this kind of uncertain tax question, and one expected to be offset over time by lower tax owed in the UK. That gap, a claim near 1.03 billion dollars against an unquantified minor adjustment, is the real outcome of this case, not the number Denmark once sought.

The wind farms behind the dispute

Hornsea 1 is rated at 1.2 gigawatts, was the first offshore wind farm in the world to pass 1 gigawatt of capacity, and powers over 1 million UK homes with 174 turbines in the North Sea. Walney Extension, in the Irish Sea off Barrow in Furness, is rated at 659 megawatts, powers nearly 600,000 homes, and is owned 50% by Orsted alongside AIP Management and PFA. Orsted operates 11 gigawatts of offshore wind capacity worldwide in total, with another 7.2 gigawatts under construction.

Capacity of the 2 wind farms in the tax ruling against the whole Orsted fleetThe 2 wind farms in the rulingOrsted total offshore fleet
030006000900012000659WalneyExtension1200Hornsea111000Orstedwholefleetmegawatts of capacity

Walney Extension capacity comes from source 3, the whole fleet figure from source 4.

Source 2.

Show the numbers
Walney Extension659
Hornsea 11200
Orsted whole fleet11000

What Orsted does next

Orsted says it will now apply the same reasoning the commission used in this case to try to settle similar tax questions on other projects, so this ruling could shape how the company handles cross border tax exposure well beyond Hornsea 1 and Walney Extension.

Sources

  1. Orsted receives final opinion regarding taxation of Walney Extension and Hornsea 1. Orsted A/S. Published 2026-09-10. Accessed 2026-09-29.
  2. Our wind farms, Hornsea 1. Orsted UK. Accessed 2026-09-29.
  3. Walney Extension. Orsted UK. Accessed 2026-09-29.
  4. Orsted, 0RHE, secures final EU tax ruling affirming UK tax jurisdiction for Walney Extension and Hornsea 1 offshore wind farms. Kalkine Media. Published 2026-09-10. Accessed 2026-09-29.
  5. Denmark's Orsted says commission backs UK taxation of British wind farms. Reuters, via Global Banking and Finance Review. Published 2026-09-11. Accessed 2026-09-29.

Was this article helpful

Back to the home page