Solar panels raise yields for crops that need water and cut them for crops that need light

A Bangladesh field trial found shade under solar panels cut onion yield by 20.3% and raised turmeric yield by 8.7%. Three other sources, on 2 more continents, found the same split.

8.7%3more turmeric grown under solar panels than in the open field, in a Bangladesh trial
6%2more soybean grown under solar panels in a dry region, in a United States crop model, the only crop and region combination in the model that gained
10%5maximum share of a field that elevated solar panels may occupy under the German standard for these systems, leaving the rest to farm

What every source found

A solar panel over a field blocks light a plant would otherwise use, but it also cools the soil underneath and cuts how much water evaporates from it. Four independent sources, on 3 continents, checked what that trade does to real crops, and all 4 agree on which crops gain and which lose. Crops that mostly need water gain yield under the panels. Crops that mostly need light lose yield under the panels.

How yield changed for 8 crops under panels in a Bangladesh trial
Onion, yield lost20.3Garlic, yield lost19.4Eggplant, yield lost14.7Tomato, yield lost14.3Coriander leaves, yield lost14.3Red spinach, yield lost10.7Ginger, yield gained12.3Turmeric, yield gained8.70510152025percent yield change against the open field control

The trial is small, 0.01 hectares at 2 sites, so the direction of the change matters more than the exact size.

Source 3.

Show the numbers
Onion, yield lost20.3
Garlic, yield lost19.4
Eggplant, yield lost14.7
Tomato, yield lost14.3
Coriander leaves, yield lost14.3
Red spinach, yield lost10.7
Ginger, yield gained12.3
Turmeric, yield gained8.7

The clearest evidence comes from a 2 growing season field trial in Narayanjot and Ranachandi, Bangladesh, where researchers grew 8 crops under solar panels and compared each one against an identical plot in the open. Onion lost 20.3% of its yield under the panels, and garlic lost 19.4%. Turmeric gained 8.7%, and ginger gained 12.3%. The trial plots were small, 0.01 hectares each at 2 sites, so the exact percentages could shift in a larger trial, but the direction of the split matched every other source checked for this article.

Why some crops gain

Shade slows evaporation, so the soil under a panel holds more water for longer. A crop model built for United States growing regions, calibrated against real field measurements, found that shading raised the amount of grain produced for every unit of water used by 14% for maize and 16% for soybean in a dry region. The same model found soybean grown in that dry region was the only crop and region combination in the whole study that gained yield under the panels, up 6%, because water, not light, was already the scarcer resource there before any panel was added.

In a model, maize lost more yield under panels in wetter regions
051015202512Semiarid22Semihumid24Humidpercent yield lost under panels, modeled against open field maize in the same region

This is a crop model calibrated against 2 real field sites, not a field trial across all 3 regions. Every value here is a loss except soybean in the semiarid region, which gained 6% and is not plotted, see the stat tile instead.

Source 2.

Show the numbers
Semiarid12
Semihumid22
Humid24

Why some crops lose

Where light, not water, is the limit on a crop, the same shade only takes away what the plant needed more of. In the Bangladesh trial, eggplant lost 14.7% of its yield, tomato and coriander leaves each lost 14.3%, and red spinach lost 10.7%. In wetter years, a long running German trial site at Heggelbach, near Lake Constance, recorded yield losses of up to 20% on wheat, barley, rye, triticale, potatoes, celery and clover grass grown under panels.

Shade intolerant crops, such as cereals, onion, garlic, and tomato, showed yield reductions, whereas turmeric, ginger, leafy vegetables, and other tuber crops performed better under partial shading.

Shahana Afrose Chowdhury and colleagues, a document quote, researchers at the University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh who ran the trial. Source 3.

The water numbers and the land law

In a Chinese trial that paired solar panels with a new drip irrigation system against plain dryland farming with no drip system, soil water content directly under the panels measured 91.7% higher at the seedling stage, 151% higher at flowering and 153% higher at the filling stage, compared with the dryland plot. Because the panels and the irrigation upgrade were installed together, that increase measures the whole new system, not shade by itself.

Soil water rose most as the season went on under panels in a Chinese trial with new drip irrigation added
05010015017591.7Seedling151Flowering153Fillingpercent higher soil water content than the open dryland plot without drip irrigation

This trial paired new drip irrigation with the panels, so the rise also reflects the irrigation upgrade, not shade by itself.

Source 1.

Show the numbers
Seedling91.7
Flowering151
Filling153

Germany writes a limit into the law that governs these systems regardless of the shading question. Under the standard called DIN SPEC 91434, a solar array mounted high enough to farm underneath may take up no more than 10% of a field, and a ground mounted array no more than 15%, so most of the field stays farmable by law regardless of what the shade does to any single crop.

Sources

  1. Agrivoltaics Combined with Integrated Water Fertilizer Management Promotes Soybean Yield in a Semi Arid Sandy Region. Xiaojin Zou, Jiayi Xu, Yiwen Huang, Muyu Tian, Ziqi Liu, Tingting Li, Jiaji Wang, Liang Gong, Liangshan Feng, Life, volume 16, issue 7, article 1062. Published 2026-06-25. Accessed 2026-09-02.
  2. Climate driven divergence in biophysical and economic impacts of agrivoltaics. Mengqi Jia, Bin Peng, Kaiyu Guan, David M Lawrence, Evan H DeLucia, Alan K Knapp, Greg A Barron Gafford, Madhu Khanna, Danica L Lombardozzi, Matthew A Sturchio, Steven A Kannenberg, Lei Zhao, James McCall, Jinyun Tang, Carl J Bernacchi, Paul Mwebaze, Fahd Majeed, DoKyoung Lee, Alson Time, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, volume 123, issue 10. Published 2026-03-02. Accessed 2026-09-02.
  3. Exploring Agrivoltaics, A Pathway to Climate Resilient and Productive Land Use in Northern Bangladesh. Shahana Afrose Chowdhury, Nayma Akther Jahan, Md Sakhawat Hossain Saikat, Haseeb Md Irfanullah, Samiya Ahmed Selim, Center for Sustainable Development, University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh, Plant Environment Interactions, volume 7, issue 3. Published 2026-04-27. Accessed 2026-09-02.
  4. Wheat Functional Traits and Photosynthetic Responses to Dynamic Shading in Agrivoltaic Systems. Clementine Inghels, Paul Emile Noirot Cosson, Annie Guiller, Thomas Kichey, Physiologia Plantarum, volume 178, issue 4, article e70997. Published 2026-07-06. Accessed 2026-09-02.
  5. Agri photovoltaics, research and information. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE. Accessed 2026-09-02.

Was this article helpful

Back to the home page