Iron phosphate battery cells needed more heat to lose control than nickel cells in a matched laboratory test

In a laboratory test using the same cell design and method for both chemistries, a nickel battery cell lost control at 221 degrees Celsius and peaked at 454 degrees. An iron phosphate cell in the same test lost control at 243 degrees and peaked at only 311 degrees.

22 degrees Celsius1more heat an iron phosphate cell needed to lose control than a nickel cell in the same matched test, MAOWCE arithmetic on source 1 figures
143 degrees Celsius1cooler the iron phosphate cell peak was than the nickel cell peak in the same test, MAOWCE arithmetic on source 1 figures
more than 20,000 gallons4water applied over at least 2 hours to control 1 crash damaged nickel chemistry battery, a federal safety report found

What losing control means

A lithium battery cell can enter a chain reaction inside itself called thermal runaway, where heat builds faster than the cell can lose it until nothing stops it. A peer reviewed review of battery failure testing compiled results from a study that tested a nickel manganese cobalt cell and an iron phosphate cell side by side, the same cylindrical shape and size, charged to the same level, pushed to failure by the identical method, so the 2 results can be compared directly.

The numbers from a matched test

The nickel cell reached the point where its heating became unstoppable at 221 degrees Celsius, then peaked at 454 degrees. The iron phosphate cell needed 243 degrees before losing control, 22 degrees more, by MAOWCE arithmetic on those 2 source 1 figures. It then peaked at only 311 degrees, 143 degrees cooler than the nickel cell and about 46% lower, both again MAOWCE arithmetic on source 1. The same study found the iron phosphate cell lost control higher and peaked lower at every charge level it tested, half charge and quarter charge included.

Temperature at which each cell lost control, and where it peakedtemperature it needed to lose controlup to its peak temperature
Nickel cell, full charge221 to 454 degrees CelsiusIron phosphate cell, full charge243 to 311 degrees CelsiusIron phosphate cell, half charge237 to 282 degrees CelsiusIron phosphate cell, quarter charge240 to 263 degrees Celsius0100200300400500degrees Celsius

All 4 cells are the same 18650 cylindrical format, tested with the same method inside 1 study cited by source 1. The nickel cell was tested only at full charge in that study.

Source 1.

Show the numbers
Nickel cell, full charge221 to 454 degrees Celsius
Iron phosphate cell, full charge243 to 311 degrees Celsius
Iron phosphate cell, half charge237 to 282 degrees Celsius
Iron phosphate cell, quarter charge240 to 263 degrees Celsius

The 3 stages every cell passes through

A separate peer reviewed review breaks the heating process into 3 stages that apply to any lithium battery chemistry. Initiation is when the protective layer on the negative electrode starts breaking down, at roughly 50 to 160 degrees Celsius. Acceleration follows, when the barrier between the 2 electrodes deforms and the cell starts generating gas, at roughly 120 to 250 degrees. The runaway reaction stage comes last, the strong heat producing reactions that follow, at roughly 180 to 350 degrees. The 2 cells above pass through this same 3 stage process at different temperatures.

The 3 stages any lithium battery cell passes through as it heats upstage begins atup to the stage end
Initiation50 to 160 degrees CelsiusAcceleration120 to 250 degrees CelsiusRunaway reaction180 to 350 degrees Celsius0100200300400degrees Celsius

These are general literature ranges for any lithium battery cell, not measured values for the 2 cells in chart 1. Source 2 states them to define what each stage means, not as a second temperature reading for iron phosphate specifically.

Source 2.

Show the numbers
Initiation50 to 160 degrees Celsius
Acceleration120 to 250 degrees Celsius
Runaway reaction180 to 350 degrees Celsius

Iron phosphate is not immune

Needing more heat to lose control is not the same as being unable to. In the matched test, the iron phosphate cell at full charge still went through a complete thermal runaway, just to a lower peak. A separate peer reviewed safety review found iron phosphate cells still release dangerous, flammable gas during a runaway, made mostly of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, and called the risk unexpectedly high given the chemistry reputation for staying stable. A third review names a route into runaway that skips the need for a crash or a puncture entirely, chemical crosstalk between the positive and negative electrodes that can generate enough heat on its own to trigger it.

What a real fire can cost to fight

What a real battery fire can cost to fight is documented by the National Transportation Safety Board, in a 2020 safety report built from 4 crash fires, all in nickel chemistry vehicles, not iron phosphate. The agency found 3 of the 4 crash damaged batteries reignited after firefighters believed the fire was out. 1 case needed more than 20,000 gallons of water over at least 2 hours to control a single damaged battery. The report names hydrogen, ethylene, ethane and propane, flammable gases, as the most significant part of the fire threat a damaged battery releases. None of this is specific to iron phosphate. It is what the report says a lithium battery fire in general can require.

Sources

  1. Advanced Technologies for Characterizing and Detecting Battery Thermal Failure, A Review. Advanced Science. Published 2026-05-08. Accessed 2026-08-31.
  2. A Review of Failure Modes and Safety Strategies of Lithium Ion Batteries from Materials to Systems. Advanced Science. Published 2026-06-30. Accessed 2026-08-31.
  3. Ensuring Battery Safety in Electric Vehicles, Challenges, Developments, and Future Perspectives. Small. Published 2025-07-31. Accessed 2026-08-31.
  4. Safety Risks to Emergency Responders from Lithium Ion Battery Fires in Electric Vehicles. National Transportation Safety Board. Published 2020-11-13. Accessed 2026-08-31.
  5. Advances and Challenges in Thermal Runaway Modeling of Lithium Ion Batteries. Innovation. Published 2024-04-08. Accessed 2026-08-31.

Was this article helpful

Back to the home page